###
Do
Our Legislators Remember the Virginia Tech Tragedy?
Gun
Proposals Fall Short of Common Sense Measures to End Gun Violence
Yesterday was the sixth anniversary
of the Virginia Tech massacre. As our Senate prepares to debate and vote on a
new proposal aimed at reducing gun violence, we must evaluate whether this
proposed bill honors the integrity of voters’ call for gun laws that save
lives. Send
a message to your Senators today!
Today,
the Senate will begin consideration of nine amendments to the Safe Communities,
Safe Schools Act of 2013 (S. 649). This
underlying bill includes provisions for universal background checks, but
political calculations show that it will not pass without some changes. Of those proposed changes, most common in the
media and conversations today is a proposed bipartisan amendment offered by Senators
Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Pat Toomey (R-PA), which, if approved, would essentially
replace the underlying bill. The Manchin-Toomey
amendment, as it is called, requires background checks at gun shows and for internet sales, but not for
other private sales. We thank Senators Manchin and Toomy for their efforts to
propose a compromise bill while working in a bipartisan manner. It is not often
that we see this type of cooperation across the aisle on Capitol Hill. However, this amendment fails to go far
enough toward achieving legislation that will effectively reduce gun
violence.
Background checks proposed in this amendment
are far from universal. The policy approved by the 219th General
Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) in 2010, entitled Gun
Violence and Gospel Values calls for (a) limiting legal
personal gun acquisition to one handgun a month; (b) require licensing,
registration, and waiting periods to allow comprehensive background checks, and
cooling-off periods, for all guns sold; and (c) closing the “gun show loophole”
by requiring background checks for all gun buyers.
The
Office of Public Witness is concerned that the weakened background check
proposal in the Manchin-Toomy amendment does not adequately address our denominational
policy position. Under the proposed bill, private sales of firearms at
gun shows and websites require background checks, but other types of sales are not
addressed. Therefore, unregulated sales
can occur in homes, on street corners, among friends and family members, in
work places, through newspapers, and other means. Given the highly favorable
polling data that indicate that nearly ninety percent of persons in the United
States support universal background checks, it is appalling that our political
leaders feel that a compromise on this important issue is needed at all.
Some proposed amendments, however, would strengthen the bill,
including one offered by Senator Feinstein (D-CA). Her amendment would ban certain assault-style
weapons and high-capacity magazines, while trying to close some of the loopholes
in the now-expired assault weapons ban, which was in effect 1994-2004. Another amendment, offered by Senators
Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Blumenthal (D-CT), is a slimmed down version of Senator
Feinstein’s assault weapons ban, and would ban magazines that hold more than
ten rounds of ammunition. To read about all
nine of the proposed amendments, see this blog
post by the Washington Post.
All nine amendments, including Manchin-Toomey, will require sixty
votes to pass, and the likelihood is very high that the bill will be weakened,
not strengthened through the amendment process. There comes a time, in evaluating
a bill, when we have to decide about compromise – is this the best we can do
and should we accept it? Well, this may
be the best that Congress thinks it can do, but it is not. Barring major and unexpected amendment votes,
this bill will not be the bill we need. It is
not adequate nor is it justice.
We are calling upon members of the PC(USA) to send
a loud message to our Senate that the Manchin-Toomey proposal is not
adequate to address the epidemic culture of violence that leads to more than
30,000 gun deaths per year in the United States.
Yesterday,
Director for Public Witness, J. Herbert Nelson said,
 |
| J. Herbert Nelson visits Virginia Tech Memorial |
“My
last visit to Virginia Tech was less than two months before the Newtown
shooting. I engaged in discussions with three campus ministry groups regarding
the then upcoming Presidential election. Before leaving the campus, my wife and
I visited the memorial dedicated to the students and faculty members killed in
the April 16, 2007, campus shooting. It was a sobering moment. Prayerfully, I
thought of the parents, as I remembered the deaths of children who were sent to
college for an education, but instead lost their lives in a senseless massacre.
Tears came to my eyes as I stood over the memorial space dedicated to Liviu
Librescu, a 76-year-old professor who lost his life while barricading the
classroom door to save the lives of his students. He survived the Holocaust, but could not
escape an angry kid with a gun on a university campus in the United States. The
personal stories of tragedy continue for the families of the thirty-three
people killed that day, including the family of the gunman. There are no words to
fill the void or heal the pain that the families of these persons and others
feel.
“Even
now the killing continues. Over 30,000 persons are killed by guns each year in the
United States. Since the Newtown shooting in December, 2012, over 3,000 persons
have been killed in the United States due to guns. Our culture of violence
permeates every facet of our society. Despite these gun deaths our political
leaders choose to water down legislation, catering to the perceived power of
pro-gun lobbyists, including the National Rifle Association. We need common sense gun laws in this
nation! We need courageous political leaders! It is time that we begin to hold
these elected officials accountable for the promises they make to serve the
best interest of the country.
“I
encourage you to write, call, email, tweet and/or text your Senator and tell
them to pass strong legislation that will include 1) truly universal background
checks, 2) stiffer federal gun trafficking laws and 3) a ban on assault
weapons. Click
here to write them now.
###
Notice: if you are viewing this blog post after April 17, 2013, please take action here, instead of the link below - this action alert has been updated to reflect the Senate's stunning failure to accomplish even partial gun violence prevention legislation.
###
Notice: if you are viewing this blog post after April 17, 2013, please take action here, instead of the link below - this action alert has been updated to reflect the Senate's stunning failure to accomplish even partial gun violence prevention legislation.
