JHN to Speak at Faithful Budget Congressional Briefing

2016 Budget:

The Faithful Way Forward

 April 28, 2015 · 1:30-2:30 pm · 

Capitol Visitor Center · Room HVC-215

Leaders from the Christian, Jewish, and Muslim traditions will offer faith perspectives on the federal budget and share the “Faithful Budget” as an alternative to current proposals in Congress. Join us to learn about the budget as a moral document, what these faiths say about budget priorities, and how Congress can respond.

Presenters:

Sister Simone Campbell, S.S.S.

Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby

Maggie Siddiqi

Program Director, American Muslim Health Professionals

Rabbi Jonah Pesner

Director, Religious Action Center

and Senior Vice President of the Union for Reform Judaism

Reverend Dr. J. Herbert Nelson, II

Director, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Office of Public Witness

Light refreshments will be provided

RSVP to RSVP@networklobby.org

This Faithful Budget briefing is a project of the NETWORK Education Program,

a partner of NETWORK, A National Catholic  Social Justice Lobby, providing faith-based resources related to public policy.

Oppose Budget Balanced on Backs of Poor People

Today the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives started debating their 2016 budget resolutions. Votes on these budgets will determine anti-hunger policy for the rest of this year and beyond.

If passed, the proposed budget cuts could lead to devastating increases in hunger and poverty in the U.S. and abroad. For example:

• The House budget proposal drastically cuts SNAP (formerly the Food Stamp Program) by at least 34 percent, the equivalent of up to 220 missed meals annually for each SNAP participant.
• Both budget plans would repeal the Affordable Care Act and block grant Medicaid, making deep cuts to health coverage for low-income people.
• Lifesaving international programs would be cut by 16 percent in the House budget. Funding for our international humanitarian aid budget has already been cut by 22 percent – we can’t afford any further cuts.
• Sixty-nine percent of the budget cuts in both the House and Senate come directly from programs impacting low-income people – placing the burden on those who are already suffering.
• Both House and Senate budgets allow to expire critical tax relief for the poorest workers, through the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Child Tax Credit (CTC), plunging 16 million people, including 8 million children, into deeper poverty.
• Both budgets keep the automatics budget cuts of 2011 (called sequestration) in place – and cut even further. This puts programs like WIC, food aid, and poverty focused development assistance in grave danger.  

Raise your voice with thousands of faithful advocates. Call your Senators and Representative at (800) 826-3688 in the next 24 hours. Urge them to oppose cuts to programs that are working to end hunger and poverty in the U.S. and around the world.

For more information on proposed budget cuts to programs that serve the most vulnerable people, visit our blog.

* Many thanks to Bread for the World for use of their 800-number and permission to reprint an excerpt of their action alert.

Decoding the Budget Webinar - Register Now

The Interreligious Working Group on Domestic Human Needs Presents:

 Register at:  https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/926087123122383106

Our federal budget has an enormous impact on poverty in America. Join us to learn basics about the budget appropriations process, how sequestration affects funding for domestic poverty programs, a review of some of the budget proposals we’ve seen so far in 2015, why poverty and the federal budget matter to us as advocates and people of faith, and action steps to get involved!

March 12, 2015

4:00pm Eastern

SPEAKERS:

Raed Jarrar, American Friends Service Committee

Amelia Kegan, Bread for the World

Tila Neguse, Friends Committee on National Legislation

Kathy Saile, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

REGISTER HERE:

 https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/926087123122383106

** The Interreligious Working Group on Domestic Human Needs is a Coalition of diverse faith voices speaking on poverty and economic justice in the United States. PC(USA) Office of Public Witness' Leslie Woods serves as co-chair of this table.

Post-Election Webinar: Looking Ahead

Looking Ahead: What do the 2014 elections mean for those still waiting for poverty relief?

Join faith leaders for an analysis of the 2014 midterm elections and hear the key takeaways for anti-poverty advocacy. With featured speakers:

Rev. Dr. J. Herbert Nelson; Director; Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Office of Public Witness

Barbara Weinstein; Associate Director, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

Eric Mitchell; Director of Government Relations; Bread for the World

Thursday, November 20^th

4:00 – 5:00 p.m. EST

Register at www.rac.org/calls

Who won, who lost, and other key takeaways from the 2014 mid-term elections.

·        

Are there new potential anti-poverty champions?

·        

What are the top priorities for the new Congress starting in January?

·        

What are the threats and opportunities for the programs that lift people out of poverty?

·        

How can the faith community shape their anti-poverty agenda to respond to a changing Congress?

What’s in Congress’ budget deal, and what isn’t?

House Budget Chairman Ryan and Senate Budget Chairman
Patty Murray announce the budget deal

With great aplomb, the media has been in a frenzy to report the new and seemingly unprecedented progress of Congressional budget talks.  Indeed, last week the House overwhelmingly approved (332-94) a two-year budget blueprint that will set the stage for the final weeks of negotiation at the start of the New Year.  The Members of the House who opposed the deal are, for the most part, on the far right or the far left.   The Senate will take up the measure this week, and while it has a steeper slope to climb in that chamber, it will likely pass there before the adjournment of the 1^st session of the 113^th Congress.

But what is actually in the deal?  And what is not?

First, this is NOT a funding bill.  It is a budget blueprint that essentially takes the place of the annual Budget Resolutions for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 and 2015.  These Resolutions are usually passed no later than April 15^th of the year (April 2014 for the FY15 budget).  Congress must still act on spending bills by January 15^th to avoid another government shutdown.

So, what does the budget deal do?

• It makes it much more likely that Congress will reach spending deals and avoid a government shutdown in January.
• It is also more likely that FY2015 budget negotiations will proceed in the normal order, starting early next year.
• It shrinks the sequester (across-the-board spending cuts) by $45 billion in 2014 and $18 billion in 2015. 

• This year’s $45 billion increase will be split evenly between defense and non-defense discretionary programs (2015 increases will be split evenly also).
• The mandatory programs affected by sequester (including Medicare), on the other hand, see the length of their cuts extended for two additional years, in 2022 and 2023 (i.e. more cuts in the long-term to pay for these short-term increases).
• It means that appropriators in January will be able to put some funds back into the programs that serve the most vulnerable, like Head Start and Housing Vouchers.
• It continues to protect the Defense department from bearing its full share of spending cuts by restoring some of its funding, even after it was funded in FY2013 with an additional $20 billion above the original deal that created the sequester.
• It raises some new revenue for the federal government by increasing some fees and other premiums, included the following item:
• It increases retirement contributions for new federal employees, reducing their take-home pay, even after federal workers have already been seriously attacked in recent months through furloughs, sequester, and layoffs.

What does it NOT do?

• It does not extend Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits for the long-term unemployed (workers unemployed for 27 weeks or more, not including those who have given up looking for a job and “left” the labor force), which expire on Dec. 28. 

• Without an act of Congress, 1.3 million workers will lose benefits only days after Christmas, and an additional 3.5 million workers will lose their safety net in the course of 2014. 
• According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), allowing benefits to expire will harm the economy by resulting in up to 300,000 fewer jobs by the end of 2014.
• The modest economic boost achieved by partially offsetting the sequester will essentially be counteracted by the expiration of UI for the long-term unemployed.
• It does not do anything about the U.S. debt ceiling.
• It does not make some of the deepest cuts to social and safety net programs, about which we have been concerned all year.
• It does not close corporate tax loopholes or reform the tax code in order to achieve more economic equality.  

For a more in-depth analysis of the budget deal, see this paper released by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

In all, this deal is a mixed bag.  It could have been so much worse.  But we hoped that it would be so much better.  In the short term, it provides some stability and accomplishes some measure of bipartisanship.  It makes the brinksmanship of recent months all the less likely when Members of Congress return from the holiday recess, as so many Members, especially Leadership in the House, have agreed to these spending levels. It paves the way for final spending bills in early January that will avert the next government shutdown, whose deadline looms on January 15^th.

But this bill fails U.S. workers who are and have been struggling to find jobs in a still languishing economy. It reduces take-home pay for federal workers who have already borne the brunt of furloughs and budget cuts. And it locks in the sequester for 2016-2023, so we will continue to have these funding battles every year for the foreseeable future.

In all, it is positive sign that Members of Congress from across the aisle came to the same table and negotiated a compromise -- but this is a low bar. It is a very small step in the right direction, and the Senate should pass it.  But we can do so much better for this nation and for each other.